Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dana Leigh Lyons's avatar

Thank you so much for writing about this, Claire. I try not to focus on how much time I devote to my substack compared to how much I get paid - my hourly wage is probably mere cents! But, of course, it’s about way more than dollar signs anyway. I’ve also been paying close, uncomfortable attention to how much of my identity feels wrapped up in my work here.

Similar to you, I keep monthly subs relatively high (and annual subs low). This is in part because I share vulnerable content and feel gross when people subscribe to read one article then duck out (not that this happens tons, but still). I want to "reward" people who commit for a year.

In WTAF news: I recently had someone (a free subscriber, no less) pop into my substack and shame me for charging anyone anything because I write about addiction recovery and "should" be giving that away as an act of service. I wrote a rather spicy essay in response that’s coming next week.

Expand full comment
Dan Ehrenkrantz's avatar

The harsh truth, and I apply this to myself, is that not everything written is of top quality. I aspire to that—and whenever I publish I think I’ve written something worth sharing—but when I look at some of my writing in hindsight, its shortcomings are evident.

I try to focus on publishing pieces that are truly valuable. Then I hope that I’ll get subscribers. I recognize it’s a bit naive, but I’d rather put 95% of my energy into improving the quality of what I’m writing and 5% into trying to grow my subscribers than 50/50 or some other combination that might produce faster growth.

Expand full comment
160 more comments...

No posts